California has two reparations efforts running at once. The state created the first statewide reparations task force in the country in 2020, and in June 2023 it delivered a report of more than 1,000 pages with a framework for calculating what is owed. San Francisco ran its own committee and produced its own plan the same year.
Neither government is paying anyone. The state has built an apology, a research project, and a new agency for descendants of enslaved people, but no cash program. San Francisco has a reparations fund with no city money in it. Governor Gavin Newsom has until September 30 to decide on the next bill, AB 2599. This page is the record, and the way to reach the people who decide.
AB 2599, the Truth in Disclosure Act, is on Governor Newsom's desk. It would require large corporations doing business in California to state under oath whether they profited from slavery. He must sign or veto it by September 30, and the Governor's office accepts messages by web form and phone.
Want to reach your own legislators too? Find your state senator and assemblymember. In San Francisco, the Mayor and Board of Supervisors decide whether the reparations fund ever holds city money.
Newsom is term-limited, so the next governor takes office in January 2027 and will appoint the head of the new descendants bureau. Whoever wins in November inherits every open question on this page.
No one in California has been paid. The state's reparations report is advice, the apology carries no money, and the new Bureau depends on funds the Legislature has yet to commit in full. San Francisco's fund is legally in place and financially empty.
Proposition 209, passed in 1996, bars state and local governments from giving preferential treatment based on race, sex, or ethnicity. That is why California builds its programs around descent from enslaved people instead of race, why Newsom cited legal risk in his vetoes, and why San Francisco's fund is being challenged. The lawsuit was set aside as premature, not dismissed on the merits, and it can return once money moves.
AB 2599 is about disclosure, not payment. It would create a public record of corporate ties to slavery; it would not create a reparations program.